Raportowanie schematów podatkowych Spółka w roku 2023 nie przekazała informacji o schematach podatkowych, o których mowa w art. 86a § 1 pkt 10 Ordynacji podatkowej. Informacje o złożonych przez podatnika wnioskach o wydanie ogólnej interpretacji podatkowej, o której mowa w art. 14a § 1 Ordynacji podatkowej (art. 27c ust. 2 pkt 4a CIT Akt) Spółka w roku 2023 nie złożyła wniosku o wydanie ogólnej interpretacji podatkowej. Informacje o złożonych przez podatnika wnioskach o wydanie wiążącej informacji akcyzowej, o której mowa w art. 7d ust. 1 ustawy o podatku akcyzowym (art. 27c ust. 2 pkt 4d CIT Akt) Spółka w roku 2023 nie złożyła wniosku o wydanie wiążącej informacji akcyzowej.

Birmingham, Alabama 1. Committees: 1, 2 GREGORY J. Committees: 1, 2

GLs Th Derisn and manufa.luro ot Themopl 鏖锺燠 嬲 黜社璐黜 鑫嚣 山 Ⅱ 汹 ‘巾 ¨ 帧 Ⅱ 妒 舳 "0“ 岫 枷 啕 、 WⅡ ′ l黜嬲 獭 嫩 泛Oa ν 北 濒 ㈨ |● ,‘烹钔 △ 叻 “ ∞ ·Ⅱ ·酉雨 ● 莎 ●●幽 N"● `约 t艹 9△ ●o灬●矿 ●食⒋ 1 1∞ E) 0HsAs1 8001∶ oo ” ··Ⅱ "硫 ,kⅡ 0,ⅡⅡ官● Th$Ced lc仓怡 s Vεl|】0m24"ay 19 and remans rald suoJe4 oe6ld e θv |‘ r$σ ⒑∞ | ay2 邳 2 邳 2 ∞i ∞ 1θ o7 u‘ Ci^⒉ ●|m 0| Rec仓雨怆a】 on a刂 dl |$s刂ε‘ Ce雨Πe· Mu "忉 Ⅱ 9● 仓H sA Cssn∞ 2‘ s‘ sε‘ir st铜 ●芮 i∝柿 k蓟 铷 i∽ C◇ i9F0官 "● ″灿 "证 i0"●卸 N● 邪 ●●讧Ⅱm | 启●I●| PR 忄“ | i祁|"阳 翎 ,确 ‘ ∫“ |( ")‘ “⒊a12i、 ●息*W ●内 督 此 `Ⅱ 书 吉力士热塑混合材 oHsAs1 8001∶ J`囤 区吸菏 中国江讪 i ⒍0⒌⒉ 工 2 灼⒈ "市 核 ⒛彳⒐0冫19 亦 "llj″ 热塑性 ∶链体的设讠及和 该证l‘的有效丿”ti⒛ 丿颐 经过符个少水 彳90 2$ 效 行 I讪 0i, }泞眦H煳 2 o⒎o ⒉ I‘ "4I公 △‘j(讧 Ⅱ‘ ^灬 贩两 `￠ 灬 ●Ⅱ’、奥 Ⅱ‘‘ |Ⅱ ● "“ Ⅱu● ="∮ `Ⅱ ● △●Ⅱ‘ "40南 ∵1|● ‘、W 炉9彳 Ⅱ1△●礻i 品 讨 缃 社 锣 珊 号 γ 猢 扌 弟 !

出差期間， 您應該： 1. 請遵守兩個簡單準則： 1. 道德熱線： https://www.Avient.com/company/policies-and-governance/ethics-hotline 道德熱線電話： 1-877-228-5410 https://www.Avient.com/company/policies-and-governance/ethics-hotline 北美 全球總部，美國 Avon Lake 33587 Walker Road Avon Lake, OH, United States 44012 免費電話：+1 866 765 9663 電話：+1 440 930 1000 傳真：+1 440 930 3064 亞太地區 地區總部，中國上海 金蘇路 200 號 C 幢 2 樓 中國上海，郵編 201206 電話：+86 (0) 21 6028 4888 傳真：+86 (0) 21 6028 4999 南美 地區總部，巴西聖保羅 Av.

Playbook in current environment 1. Executing flawlessly and continue advancing our strategy while prioritizing investments and resources for our growth vectors 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Color, Additives & Inks END MARKETS REGIONS 34% 21% 15% 11% 8% Packaging Telecom 1%Energy 1% 34% US & Canada Latin America Europe, Middle East Construction 15Copyright © .

Figure 1. Regarding tensile properties, three additional categories granted positive marks: 1. REFERENCES 1.

This information is as of March 1, 2023. Nicolas (1) 111,000 140,027 251,027 K.J. Name Number of Deferred Shares(1) R.E.

Boundaries of the reporting company GHG emissions covered by the verification:  Operational Control  Global Exclusions:  Fugitive refrigerants Types of GHGs: CO2, N2O, CH4 GHG Emissions Statement:  Scope 1: 18,242 metric tons of CO2 equivalent  Scope 2 (Location-Based): 134,244 metric tons of CO2 equivalent  Scope 2 (Market-Based): 85,892 metric tons of CO2 equivalent  Scope 3: o Category 3 – Fuel and energy-related activities (electricity transportation and distribution losses only): 8,777 metric tons of CO2 equivalent Data and information supporting the Scope 1 and Scope 2 GHG emissions assertion were in most cases historical in nature and in some cases were estimated. Energy: o Diesel Fuel Consumption: 7,268,012 kWh o Natural Gas Fuel Consumption: 90,498,342 kWh o Renewable Energy - Self Generated (solar): 252,779 kWh o Renewable Energy - Self Generated (Wind): 2,399,531 kWh o Electric Power: 339,815,274 kWh Page 2 WATER RESOURCES • ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES • HEALTH & SAFETY • CLIMATE CHANGE Apex Companies, LLC • (800) 733-2739 • www.apexcos.com o Renewable Energy Credit (REC): 121,411,062 kWh o Renewable Power – Offsite: 27,119,749 kWh Period covered by GHG emissions verification:  January 1, 2021 to December 31, 2021 GHG Reporting Protocols against which verification was conducted:  World Resources Institute (WRI)/World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD) Greenhouse Gas Protocol, Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard, Revised Edition (Scope 1 and 2) and the GHG Protocol Scope 2 Guidance, an amendment to the GHG Protocol Corporate Standard  WRI/WBCSD Corporate Value Chain (Scope 3) Accounting and Reporting Standard Verification Protocols used to conduct the verification:  ISO 14064-3 Second Edition 2019-04: Greenhouse gases - Part 3: Specification with guidance for the verification and validation of greenhouse gas statements  Apex’s standard procedures and guidelines for external Assurance of Sustainability Reports and International Standard on Assurance Engagements (ISAE) 3000 Revised, Assurance Engagements Other than Audits or Reviews of Historical Financial Information (effective for assurance reports dated on or after Dec. 15, 2015), issued by the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board. Verification Opinion: Based on the verification process and procedures conducted to a limited assurance level of the GHG emissions statement shown above, Apex found no evidence that the GHG emissions statement:  is not materially correct and is not a fair representation of the GHG emissions data and information; and  has not been prepared in accordance with the WRI/WBCSD GHG Protocol Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard (Scope 1 and 2), and WRI/WBCSD Greenhouse Gas Protocol Corporate Value Chain Accounting and Reporting Standard (Scope 3).

GUIDELINES FOR USING CESA CLEAN ADDITIVES • Cesa Clean works best when molded maintaining normal (injection) pressure/shear • For best results, Avient recommends a “Running Color Change” which eliminates breaks in the molding cycle • Since the Cesa Clean concentrate will expand, it is recommended to reduce the shot size by 20% • It is designed for use at a let-down ratio (LDR) of 3.0% or (33:1); however, use rate can vary depending on the severity of the contamination but typically is 2.0–4.0% (a use rate higher than 6.0% may not have any positive affect on the cleaning performance) • Using Cesa Clean as a routine part of your color change rotation will allow faster changes and consume a minimal amount of raw material - Note: If the manifold is not cleaned routinely, this process may be more time consuming and additional material will be required • It is best to process at your normal polymer processing temperatures - For best performance, stock temperature should be at least 400°F - If 400°F is achieved during the purging process, no additional activation will occur during the reprocessing of regrind - All parts produced during the “Running Purge Cycle” should be captured as regrind, resulting in a scrap-free color change - If using sequential gates, open and close all gates at the same time while purging the tool - If contamination appears to be coming from one gate, open and close first, and for an extended period of time, to force more material through this location - When cleaning in this manner, pay close attention to shot size - Parts containing the previous or new color plus any Cesa Clean can be used as regrind INTRODUCING CESA CLEAN TO YOUR PROCESS Hand Blend • Hand weigh enough of the Cesa Clean and natural resin mix to equate to 3–5 times the barrel capacity • Use rate should be 3.0% or 33:1 for routine cleaning • For difficult-to-clean tooling, or tooling which is not routinely cleaned, start at 4.0% or 25:1 • Note: Do not attempt to vacuum load more than 15 feet from source as stratification/separation may occur Volumetric Feeder • Calibrate feeder to dispense 3.0% or 33:1 for routine cleaning • For difficult-to-clean tooling, or tooling which is not routinely cleaned, start at 4.0% or 25:1 • This style of feeder is highly recommended for at-the-throat metering of Cesa Clean Blending Units Most blenders have an extra bin for an additive • Fill the additive bin with Cesa Clean • Set blender to introduce the Cesa Clean at 2.0 to 4.0% • Note: Do not air convey any further than 15 feet as Cesa Clean has a high density and may separate from the mix.

Boundaries of the reporting company GHG emissions covered by the verification:  Operational Control  Global Exclusions:  Fugitive refrigerants  Mobile Combustion Types of GHGs: CO2, N2O, CH4 GHG Emissions Statement:  Scope 1: 34,627 metric tons of CO2 equivalent  Scope 2 (Location-Based): 167,333 metric tons of CO2 equivalent  Scope 2 (Market-Based): 99,465 metric tons of CO2 equivalent  Scope 3: o Category 3 – Fuel and energy-related activities: 62,049 metric tons of CO2 equivalent Data and information supporting the Scope 1 and Scope 2 GHG emissions assertion were in most cases historical in nature and in some cases were estimated. Energy: o Diesel Fuel Consumption: 4,754,671 kWh o Natural Gas Fuel Consumption: 184,415,668 kWh o Renewable Energy Consumed - Self Generated (solar): 260,378 kWh o Renewable Energy Consumed - Self Generated (Wind): 2,554,186 kWh o Grid Electricity Consumed: 436,400,546 kWh Page 2 WATER RESOURCES • ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES • INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE  •  SAFETY  •  SUSTAINABILITY  Apex Companies, LLC • (800) 733‐2739 • www.apexcos.com  o Renewable Energy Credits (REC) Purchased: 100,691,000 kWh o Renewable Electricity Consumed – Offsite: 128,982,866 kWh Period covered by GHG emissions verification:  January 1, 2022 to December 31, 2022 GHG Reporting Protocols against which verification was conducted:  World Resources Institute (WRI)/World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD) Greenhouse Gas Protocol, Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard, Revised Edition (Scope 1 and 2) and the GHG Protocol Scope 2 Guidance, an amendment to the GHG Protocol Corporate Standard  WRI/WBCSD Corporate Value Chain (Scope 3) Accounting and Reporting Standard Verification Protocols used to conduct the verification:  ISO 14064-3 Second Edition 2019-04: Greenhouse gases - Part 3: Specification with guidance for the verification and validation of greenhouse gas statements  Apex’s standard procedures and guidelines for external Assurance of Sustainability Reports and International Standard on Assurance Engagements (ISAE) 3000 Revised, Assurance Engagements Other than Audits or Reviews of Historical Financial Information (effective for assurance reports dated on or after Dec. 15, 2015), issued by the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board. Verification Opinion: Based on the verification process and procedures conducted to a limited assurance level of the GHG emissions statement shown above, Apex found no evidence that the GHG emissions statement:  is not materially correct and is not a fair representation of the GHG emissions data and information; and  has not been prepared in accordance with the WRI/WBCSD GHG Protocol Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard (Scope 1 and 2), and WRI/WBCSD Greenhouse Gas Protocol Corporate Value Chain Accounting and Reporting Standard (Scope 3).